Over the past decade or so, we have been able to read about human brain and genetic research almost every month, revealing all sorts of amazing discoveries. The future of this scientific field is becoming more invented and broader, thus helping since unlock the mysteries of mankind for a long time about itself recently I saw a TV program about the mystery of neuroscientists study of music - for example, music is how come we are to see why it respond?? After the show, I have the following two parts: the magic of this unique research, and the frustration of turning the wrong direction of knowledge. Let me come together.
Research at McGill University in Toronto is already underway. It is foreseeable that through brain imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging, we have found that many parts of the brain are active in response to music , which confirms that music is in the human brain. It forms its unique sensory pattern. The primitive neural signals are transmitted to the brain's central cortex (which is responsible for processing the sound), and are divided into specific areas to deal with rhythm, beats, melody, timbre, etc., and are completed in a few milliseconds. The cortex can also compare the music you prefer to hear based on your past listening experience. By comparison, your brain will be surprised by the unexpected music , and of course the surprise may be pleasant or disgusting.
All extremely complex information is unknowingly transmitted between the tiny regions of the brain, but without these transmissions, music can only be heard as chaotic noise. Maybe you can claim that you are using your own soul, heart, and even everything. to feel the music. but in fact everything you feel nothing but a neurological addition to accept the study also showed that childhood music will form a fixed "path" in our brain. such as Chinese children's brain will tune to China Producing special connections makes them feel happy. A child from the western United States who accepts the western tunes, then he will like this tune instead of China, and vice versa. Finally, the researchers control through the computer A musical performance to see if the brain reacts differently to different music . As the music becomes more tedious, the brain often does not notice its changes unless the changes become apparent. This may explain "fungus" and professional musicians discerning differences in different musical styles: different "lines" led to a different appreciation.
Everything mentioned above is very appealing. It is a good example of the facts that have been gained through popular perceptions and daily observations. But the 7-digit MRI is not used to tell us about different music in the brain. The reaction is not used to observe whether one person's reaction is different from another person, not to explain that Chinese music does not please the ears of American cowboys. But the promissory note is huge. As the research continues, we find now still in an early stage. but as long as there is enough time, scientists can be sure about music all exposed, especially to explain why music is "carved into" the evolution of modern man in our genes. obviously the There is some form of music in every history, even if it is traced back to the oldest civilization. So why does evolution favor this behavior so much? Or even regard it as one of the basics of survival? All brain researchers, geneticists, and evolutionary biologists will make definitive answers for the foreseeable future.
I am happy to prove why this whole direction about the plan to look at music is wrong, and that they can't find an answer to the truth. The music- brain-based connection that the above research can establish can only be heard. For robots with robotic brains to be effective, the above research is based on this model, so that all of this seems meaningless: its inner core is not human at all. We can deal with Parkinson's disease or treat stroke patients. These studies are taken in practice, which is indeed medically effective because the condition meets the following three factors:
1. Some tissue functions of the brain are damaged.
2. The damaged part can be isolated.
3. The damaged part can be detected.
Medically, the repair of injury function is well understood, and no one can deny the tremendous progress in the analysis of various diseases. The development of medicine makes people understand the function of the brain more carefully, and the surgeon can be better. When the work is done, the drug can be directed to the treatment more accurately. However, when this direction is turned into music , modern medicine is hard to help because:
1. There is no brain function damage
2. The parts of the brain that produce music are so complex that it is difficult to connect them together.
3. The process of transforming "noise notes" into meaningful music in reality cannot be theoretically observed.
4. The mechanism of music emergence in different societies cannot be fully known, because for the more developed brain, this has no evolutionary advantage.
Is there really a specific explanation behind this? If we focus on music as much as we focus on brain malignant tumors and invest more money to study, can we get a better answer? If this whole model is There is no fundamental error? But in any case, the idea that the brain can produce music through the original physical data (the vibration of the air molecules) is always recognized. The radio can also produce music , but the comparison between the two is It's ridiculous, because the radio uses a rigid, well-determined handler, so no matter how similar the two are, the radio can't compare with the human brain.
Music proves a fact that science cannot accept: it is one of the functions of the mind. The brain is nothing more than a handler for the music that you want to hear. A person’s preference for music is not controlled by the brain’s emotional control center. But by his mind. When a creator like Beethoven emerges inspiration, his heart gives him, not his nerves. You will ask why I am so sure, this answer may have to be written. I have a whole book. But I can still briefly divide it into the following three parts:
1. The flaws of traditional mechanical models and their contradictions
If the brain forms a fixed "pathway" only during childhood, such as listening to Chinese music in China, listening to Indian music in India, and listening to Japanese music in Japan, why do all the countries have symphony orchestras? Are natives, but playing Western classical music ? You can't say that they will be fixed, because these "lines" can be changed in the future. "Decision" looks good under the neurological system, but its In reality, it does not apply. By analogy, brain researchers are trying to tell us that "family lines can convert AC power to DC", which is similar to my brain "deciding" to like Chinese music .
If many interconnected areas in the brain work together to process music , the corresponding sound reception does not know which one to pre-process if it is dealing with the sound of the chainsaw and the wind blowing through the leaves. The auditory center receives all the original information through the inner ear canal, and then the chainsaw (noise) is "isolated" on the subsequent sound processing. On the other hand, the sound from the piano directly enters the sound processing. The link. This shows that the auditory center has long been able to distinguish music . This is a late function. But why the difference between music and noise is still a mystery. We know their differences, but we don't know why they differ.
Prefrontal by individuals have heard of a relatively new music to hear music. This makes these songs let us excited or happy, because it won our expectations, but the same people may have the same music in different periods have different Reaction. I may not feel jazz someday, but after a day I may suddenly like it; I may also be bored with Ella Fitzgerald, just think she is very good. In other words, people are The reaction of music is uncertain and subjective, because these changes are unpredictable. There is no mechanical system that can explain these various changes, and controlling and reducing these randomness can only make the problem more complicated. You can't expect a pre-set neurochemical process to produce two opposite results.
2. Positive reasons for understanding the heart (not the brain)
Music reveals why some human behavior in biological or evolutionary perspective seems meaningless. We just like music because I like the music, not because our ancestors or better infant gene favorite music. Find The evolution that appears for music seems to be the end of the cart. Compared to getting music to live, we enjoy life more and thank music . Our hearts are often moved by it. In the eyes of some evolutionists, what humans should listen to should be inclined It is most likely to be sensitive, so our ancestors can hear the lion barking 100 yards away, not just 10 or 20 yards. It is the way to survive without being eaten. Or you can hear two feet of product like an arctic fox. The sound of the mouse under the snow, more things in the winter means a greater chance of survival. But we have not evolved that kind of keenness, on the contrary, we only get the most useless, only for the use of music for pleasure. Love affection.
Music is privatized, changeable and unpredictable. It does not have the scientific need to correct the flaws. It is a part of human civilization. A very famous example: the soldiers at the stop sang Christmas songs crawl out of the ditch. What is more human is: their behavior, or the fearless spirit of fighting for this ignorant war, is the expression of human civilization. The complexity of music is never Explain clearly.
Music is spontaneous. Some new songs are generated involuntarily. New styles are often inspired by accidental inspiration. You can't put data from Beethoven into Mozart in the computer. There is a creative gap between the two. But let us assume that we can build such a supercomputer, he can deposit all the chords and phrases, (by the way, this may be more than all the atoms in the universe) let us use the computer to make all the possibilities The music style, there will always be a moment when Beethoven's songs are completely written. But this is an extreme example that makes the "Electric Brain" model meaningless, because Mozart or Beethoven can not count Millions of hours of random music combination to create a new style. On the contrary, a new style was born, a soul that listened to the old style of the past, successfully surpassed the predecessors, and forever changed the pattern of classical music. .
3. Intractable diseases
Nowadays, many occasions are used to refer to the physical and mental problem (the traditional name of the past) as "the hard problem". This is related to the physical processing of the brain and the emotional consequences. If the brain passes through the nerves Activities, in turn, produce conscious cognition, and then produce a machine that mimics the bioelectrical conduction of the nervous system to produce human consciousness (or a similar mechanism using visual coding). In that case, one Computers can also produce music , and may even become a creative genius. This is the position of advocates of artificial intelligence.
But music is such a field that makes these ideas a fantasy. There is no physical process that makes the air vibrate and become music . There is no sound in the brain. It is a completely silent environment. Of course, we can say that we can put music in our heads. Or we can hear what we think, but this is just a vivid metaphor. The sound of the violin seems to be by the side, but this is just an illusion, but the music is like every artifact, built on The mysterious change from quantity to sensation. In short, the audible sound information hits the eardrum in the form of sound waves, and finally becomes the music we hear. They contain sweetness, emotion, happiness and all the feelings. The human experience is not based on data, but on feelings. This is the eternal and constant feeling of the world that our nervous system can handle. Music is completely in the mind, he can't simply go from the radio, Piano, small draw, or a collection of neural signals.
This is my shortest overview of music and the brain. Science shouldn't be limited because we never know what will happen in the future. Still, I still think it is not feasible to try to make a mechanical model of the brain. Because the mind model is meaningless. It is like trying to correct bad driving through the drawings of the car carburetor. It is useless. Finally, the machine model of the brain can only pretend to have a mind, but people are getting more and more Stay away from the truth of understanding things: How does the meaning of things exist in the world? Why is it so "intentional"?
Lithium Battery,Lithium Batteries,Lithium Polymer Battery,Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery
Power X (Qingdao) Energy Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.qdpowerxsolar.com