7100 is a great machine, I have only used it with Sigma 18 35 hook, equivalent 27-52.5, basic all-around focal length, constant large aperture, with a very comfortable
Except very heavy. .
And huge volume. .
Not bad performance, resistance to the operation of the fuselage, compared to the 5XXX more professional operation and small shoulder screen, and very low price, making it a new mobile phone with a cost-effective high, so far if anyone wants me to recommend 5000 budget buy SLR I will still push it first
D7100 fight with cats
What is the reason that (jie) let me abandon 7100 to choose the Dafa A72?
What handle is too small, too heavy, I can make a hundred
The most important of course is because
He is not full-frame
Sony (SONY) ILCE-7M2/a7M2 a72 a7II full-frame micro-camera single body (without lens) 8688 yuan Jingdong direct link 
Full frame is enough
Now A7M2 stand-alone price is around 8000, and A7 even as long as 5000+
A difference in the price of a shot, but before I bought it, I went to Taikoo Hui Sony Store to experience it.
A7's key layout is really hard to accept, the most let me poison is the five-axis image stabilization, the real value of 3,000, specifically behind to say
After more than a dozen hours of waiting, I received the express delivery from the SF brother, let me have the pleasure at the time of opening the box at 7100.
Put some body details
Charming full CMOS, really want to use the thumb down ~~
I bought a stand-alone machine and I did not buy the 28 70 heads.
In fact, I heard that the quality of the hedging is still very good, but I think other than the scenery can not use this head (in fact, is not willing to use the hedge)
I usually shoot more portraits, sugar droplets, large apertures and blur the dog, I don't have much budget, FE50 1.8 became my first choice
Combination effect
In fact, the evaluation of this head on the Internet is very low, and it is called an expensive sip. These are the X shots, Lan X strongly recommend the purchase of the lens.
In fact, I think, this shot is not so bad. This picture quality is certainly better than CN's swearing fine, compared to the CN's 50 1.8 price is indeed not cheap, but in fact the 1300 second-hand price to enhance the quality of the picture is still worth the price
Workmanship is not too bad, I used that 50 1.8D, 35 1.8G, D7100, can be said to work better than these two
Especially the focus ring of 35 1.8G, the memory is still fresh, very uncomfortable, feel super astringent, but fortunately there is not much opportunity for me to manually focus on the 7100
And this FE50 1.8 focus ring I think is very good, moderate damping, a bit like the Sigma 18 35 touch
Although the lower body is plastic, it does not feel bad, but rather it makes it a lot lighter
The place where the head was awarded most was in its focus. It was awful. It was like pulling the bellows. It was still possible to have enough light and speed. It was just an action to pull the bellows. Although the bellows action was soon finished, it was It will make people think he is too hesitant
As for the lack of light, the bellows action is much slower. Once and for all, then it slowly swallows up and tells you to focus. This time I miss the decisiveness of 7100 focus and quickly get the hand is V0.1 firmware. The latest V0.3 firmware does not really feel much improvement
However, it didn't make much difference to me. During the day, focusing was still very comfortable. As for the night, I chose to focus manually.
Micro single peak focus, let me fall in love with manual focus
The feeling of getting a hand is that it's really small, light and good (compared with the 7100+ Sigma 18 35)
Although I had touched the real machine early, I still couldn't help but sigh when I got my machine.
First suppress and then raise
1, the handle is not much more comfortable than the D7100, although not so crowded, but did not hold the 810's comfort, small disappointment
2, physical buttons do not have the 7100 to a reasonable comfort, many features need their own custom keys can be more convenient to use, such as: select the focus, select the focus mode, select the metering mode or even switch manual AF
3, the body reaction is not fast, especially when the photos look at the point of magnification, will be stuck, and then put the picture is particularly large, each time manually reduce the size of
4. The flip screen poses a bit less, although it is much more convenient than the 7100 without the flip screen. Why are you not willing to use Canon's low-end machine that kind of 360 ° flip flip screen, but also simple and easy to use
5, high sense of poor (reported), in fact, from the residual change to the full I still very satisfied with the high sense of performance, but it is said that even lower prices are not as good as the D610
6, very very expensive! The power supply touches a few drops of electricity and drops off at a speed that is visible to the naked eye. At 7100 hours, I never worry about the power. With the A7M2, I went to order a few spare batteries the next day.
It is said that the EVF viewfinder consumes more power
Let’s talk about its advantages,
Peak focus is very convenient! With the 7100, there was no split-image focusing screen, no peak focus, and no manual focus. Really cool
Then the four pulsators are very comfortable, especially the independent exposure compensation pulsator, which is very good!
WYSIWYG viewfinder is also a place that makes me very comfortable (Nikon's LCD viewing is a squat!)
Then the most important thing is
Five axis anti-shake
First look at the performance of five-axis image stabilization
Shutter 1/13 F1.8
Shutter 1/13 F4
Shutter 1/13 F4
Shutter 1/10 F4
All are shot with a FE50 of 1.8 (currently only this one.)
In theory, the safety shutter must be at least 1/50 or faster to keep the hand held. The 1/13 shutter is still so clear that it surprises me.
Let us challenge the limit of the five-axis image stabilization
1/8 clearly available
1/4 is still clearly available
4/5 send friends circle is enough
1s will not continue
Visible, 50mm still life, shutter to 1/4 are very good, almost unbeatable
When shooting people tried holding 1/8 seconds without paste, but the model is not willing to put up not map it
Such a strong anti-shake, to some extent make up for the lack of high sense of the same environment the same lens, 5D4 iso6400 noise is better than what the A72 then, A72 then just open iso3200 enough light into it, or you iso 6400 with iso 3200 To play?
Overall, the A7M2 is still very satisfying to me. Of course, the freshness brought by the door change has given me a lot of points.In the future, I will consider starting with several cheap and easy-to-use manual head compensations.
include
Sanyang 85 1.4, the second-hand price of 1500, the quality is very good in the telephoto manual head, virtual foot, telescopic section of the space compression feeling, shooting outdoor portrait or some scenery will be particularly good-looking;
The old frog 12 2.8, the price of this head is not cheap, but claims 0 distortion and great quality, let me deeply poisoned, use it to shoot scenery is definitely very cool
Or the old frog 15 is also a good choice, a lot cheaper, about 2000 second-hand price;
Then, I look forward to the 35 horses of the Sigma Technology for the FE.
Very much looking forward to ~
Step Up Transformer,High Frequency Transformer,Step Up-Down Voltage Converters,Electronic Switching Power Supply Transformer
Huizhou Show-Grand Electronics Co., Ltd. , https://www.sgtransformer.com