IBM's supercomputer "Deep Blue" shocked the world when it defeated Western chess champion Garry Kasparov twenty years ago, making people realize that breakthroughs have been made in artificial intelligence (AI) technology; but that is in the Western world. The computer that beats humans on the chess table is still and stays in a room. Twenty years later, we witnessed the US government’s traffic safety authority acknowledging the AI ​​system of the pilot vehicle, which is a “driver†that complies with federal regulations.
Since then, robots/auto-driving vehicles (without human driver assistance) have been considered equivalent to human driving. This decision is for the future unmanned vehicles to freely shuttle through the streets of American cities, and to share the right to use human driving. The road. Do I sound a bit paranoid? Maybe, but undoubtedly in my mind, this little official statement clears the main obstacles for tomorrow's self-driving vehicles.
In November last year, Google’s Automated Vehicles Department presented a proposal for autonomous vehicle design that “doesn’t require human driving†in a letter to the NaTIonal Highway Traffic Safety AdministraTIon (NHTSA). Google asked NHTSA to explain how to make the company's self-driving vehicles meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS).
Google’s self-driving car for road testing was stopped by the police
NHTSA said in a letter to Google on February 4, 2016 that the agency will interpret the mentioned autopilot system as a "driver" in the design of a motor vehicle described by Google, rather than any occupant of the vehicle. The NHTSA letter further states: "We agree that Google's self-driving vehicles will not have the traditional drivers that have been in existence for more than a hundred years."
Obviously, NHTSA also recognizes the unstoppable nature of self-driving vehicles; its letters mention such functions as anti-lock brakes, electronic stability control and airbags, automatic emergency braking, frontal collision warnings, lane departure warnings, etc., indicating that the trend is to continue to face Google’s self-driving vehicles and vehicles that may be on the upper floors have evolved.
In view of Google's vehicle design that does not allow human occupants to take over, NHTSA concludes: "If a human occupant in a vehicle does not actually drive a vehicle, it is more reasonable to define any object that is performing a driving action as a driver; In this case, a motor vehicle device, the self-driving system (SDS) is actually driving the vehicle."
In this long, NHTSA response letter to Google, there are two main points: First, Google believes that autopilot vehicles should exclude any occupants in the vehicle to take over the driving task; second, NHTSA grants the autopilot system "driver" Qualifications, which led to the thorny issue of how to test vehicle safety. Let us discuss the first point first. NHTSA's letter revealed that Google has designed the vehicle to allow the autopilot system to control "all aspects of driving," and Google believes: "The autopilot system will always be an autopilot vehicle occupant (and pedestrians and other passers-by). Make the best decisions safely."
Google is annoyed by the letter to NHTSA.
In his letter to NHTSA, Google was annoyed: "If the human occupants on the vehicle control the mechanisms such as steering, acceleration, braking or directional lights, or provide human occupants with information about the operation of the vehicle that is completely controlled by the automatic driving system, It may be detrimental to safety because human occupants may try to override the decision of the autopilot system.†Google may be correct because human drivers may interfere with the autopilot system and have half the chance to figure out how to stop it. This is human nature. To prove to the traffic safety authority and convince the driver and other drivers on the road, Google’s autopilot system will always make the right choices, which may not be so easy; in short, this is human nature, thinking that people will accept Google’s AI system. A foolproof statement is not normal.
This led to my second focus. NHTSA clearly stated in the letter that the automatic driving system was defined as the driver and did not end the inquiry or determine the result; once the automatic driving system was identified as driving for specific standards or testing purposes Clerk: "The next question is whether and how Google can prove that the autonomous driving system meets the standards for development and design for human drivers."
The reality is that NHTSA is most likely to be unable to use the same test procedures to confirm that autonomous vehicles meet safety standards; and since US traffic safety regulations establish a compliance self-certification system, NHTSA says: “NHTSA for manufacturing The Compliance Certification (and the agency's enforcement of violations) is based on the test procedures we have established."
Logically, Google is concerned about how its autonomous driving system (without hands and feet) can meet the applicable standards set by the US Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard; however, NHTSA clearly stated: "The automatic driving system is determined to be a motor vehicle. The driver does not become an excuse for the vehicle not meeting the applicable standards for the brakes.†NHTSA definitely needs to change the language of the applicable standard; the agency said it may need to proceed with the rules to consider the US Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 135 It is possible to adapt to the relevant standards by ensuring that the situation is changed in order to ensure that autopilot vehicles designed by companies such as Google and that control all braking systems through AI drivers and do not provide braking control for vehicle occupants.
Equally important, NHTSA needed to establish a system that would certify the compliance of autonomous vehicle manufacturers, and it is clear that we are far away from such a future.
Mini PC Office
Do you know the reason why Mini PC is becoming more and more welcome nowadays? You will realize that Mini PC windows 11 absolutely should be popular if keep thinking deeply a little more, since not only there are all the functions, performance warranty, various ports, but solve the weight problem people struggle when need to move computer in old time. At this shop, you can see Mini PC office, Mini Gaming PC , j4125 Mini PC, etc. Whatever you need for normal office, design drawing, gaming, education learning or teaching, Telecast alive, daily entertainment,etc. You can always find right one here.
Of course, China All In One Business Computer, Education Laptop, Budget Business Laptop, Gaming Laptop , Yoga Laptop , Android Tablet also available at this store, since what we do is customizing Quad Core Laptop, 10.1 android tablet, PC Mini Intel and Business All In One Computer.
Another reason why more and more clients return to us is that quality with competitive price, in time and lifetime after-sales service, customized and multiple service, fast delivery time.
Home Assistant Mini PC,Custom Mini PC,Windows 11 Mini PC,j4125 Mini PC
Henan Shuyi Electronics Co., Ltd. , https://www.shuyilaptops.com