Recently, it was reported that the State Network Information Office will issue APP application development management methods in the near future. Lu Wei, director of the Central Network Information Office, revealed at the symposium on advancing cyberspace legalization that China will strengthen Internet legislation and rely on a strict legal network to create a standardized Internet.
According to the authorization of the State Council, the State Cyber ​​Information Office is responsible for online content management and online law enforcement. The APP is included in the regulatory framework, and Beijing will pilot it first. According to Jang Liqiang, director of the Beijing Internet Information Office, Beijing is studying and formulating the temporary management method for the development of Beijing's APP application public information service. Beijing's instant messaging tool public information service development management provisional regulations implementation rules Beijing Internet new technology and new business approvals Interim Measures Series regulations. It is expected that the supervision of APP will be promoted from the Internet company in Beijing to the entire country.
APP's chaotic years have led to a lack of effective supervision, but it is worrying that regulation will not make APP's business opportunities disappear.
First, the mess of APP
The APP came along with the iPhone. Before the mobile phone actually had various applications, but it did not call this name, nor did it form a climate. It was just a niche user's toy. With the development of smart phones, APP has entered our lives. From the content point of view, APP almost involved the entire Internet, from webpages to videos, from content to e-commerce, plus O2O, the entire Internet is wrapped in. Because of the special nature of smart phones, APP actually involves everyone's privacy and personal information.
The original assumption of the APP was to authorize the charges and rely on the downloader to pay for the use of money to make a profit. However, in reality, free APP is more competitive, and charging APP is almost impossible to survive. As a result, there are more and more free APPs. The company that develops APP is not Lei Feng. Developers are required to develop the APP's wages for the programmers. The company has operating costs, and there are also expensive promotion costs for the development of the APP, including the assessment of the water army brush list. Freedom is not enough. You can't think of other ways if you can't charge directly from the user. So the APP began to chaos, and the regulation of APP has not kept pace.
Fast broadcasting is a very obvious example. Offline obscene CDs are to be caught by public security. Online porn websites are to be blocked. People running such websites are to be arrested. The APP can be wildly rampant all year round and was recently reported by competitors.
Many industries have their own norms, and the lack of regulatory APP can bypass industry norms and even violate the law without paying any attention. Theft of personal privacy is something that almost 90% of apps do. A flashlight software also steals users' phone calls, text messages, contacts, and photos. The input method software records the user's bank account number and password easily. As for downloading other apps in the background, it is more common for you to insert advertisement links and induce you to click.
Without direct charges, users' rights are disregarded and even laws are disregarded, in order to steal user privacy profits, insert advertising profits, promote the profitability of other APPs, and even operate illegal industry profits. Faced with this chaotic situation, the government has no doubt about the need to strengthen supervision of APP, protect the interests of users, and safeguard the law and social order.
Second, worrying over regulation
While strengthening supervision, it is worrying about over-supervision. APP provides many innovative business models. Some business models are not illegal, but they will affect the existing pattern of interests.
For example, in the previous popular car rental software, the fast car also launched the No. 1 car, which is a challenge to the current taxi operating system. Our current system is the monopoly of the right to operate. The government passes the wholesale operation right of the CMTC and the taxi company collects high rents through the operation right. Taxi prices are high. Drivers are hard but they do not earn much because the rent for the right to operate is too high.
The car rental software model allows vehicles that do not have the right to operate to actually undertake the operational business. Although ordinary people have benefited, it is an impact on the interests of taxi drivers and transportation management departments. Without the APP regulatory agency, the Transport Control Department can only check the car, but it is still necessary to take the legal route to check if there is a right to be punished. With the APP regulatory agency, can the transportation department eliminate such software through administrative influence?
Internet innovation will inevitably have an impact on the old interest pattern. If all parties exert administrative influence through the APP regulatory agency, will Internet innovation be brought to an end? If e-commerce arises, the nation’s entity retail industry finds the Ministry of Industry and Commerce to request the suspension of e-commerce by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. Today may not be Taobao, there is no Alibaba, no Ma.
Recommended installation sofa butler Download: http://app.shafa.com/
T Series- For Wire Arrangement
Pogo pin CO.,Ltd , http://www.nspogopin.com